Thursday, 12 March 2015

Cleaning data set

Cleaning data set in SPSS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ik4Dyn8e8vA

Skewness and kurtosis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8-wf6lBh8M

Multivariate outlier (mahanalobis distance) SEM - AMOS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vtgynhkH60&feature=youtu.be

Model fit during a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in AMO
This is a model fit exercise during a CFA in AMOS demonstrates how to build a good looking model, and then address model fit issues, including modification indices and standardized residual covariances.  also discuss briefly the thresholds for goodness of fit measures
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkZGWUUjdLg

Outlier (mahanalobis distance)
SPSS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSflSmcNRFI

Plugin EFA and CFA data in amos 18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLtMOFcojZY

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19130917/how-to-fix-amos-error-observed-variable-is-represented-by-an-ellipse-in-the-pa

IBM Help discusses this error but isn't that helpful.
In practice, I've seen this error come up a number of times. It can occur because you have incorrectly specified a variable as latent that you wanted to be observed. However, more commonly, it is the result of giving an inappropriate variable to a latent variable. Specifically, it is relatively easy to give a name to a latent factor that is the same as an observed variable in your data file.
For example, one time I had some personality variables in a dataset and the extraversion items were called E1, E2, E3, and so on. These are common names for residuals. So when giving residuals these names, there was a conflict with the names in the data file. Another even more common cause is when you name a latent factor an appropriate name (e.g., selfesteem, extraversion, jobsatisfaction, etc.) and you have already created a scale score in your data file with the same name. This also causes the conflict.
The basic solution is just to give the variable a latent variable a unique name that doesn't conflict with one in the data file. So for example, name the variable selfesteem_factor rather than selfesteem if you already have a variable called selfesteem

Reverse coding in spss
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDK_u4l7vJI  (part 1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkTvKf5nFsY (part 2)

Super easy to understand - reverse coding
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzQ_522F2SM

Saturday, 3 January 2015

PARAPHRASE

Pharaprase 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3vCnxr69oXLY01UODNQSWh3SHc/view?pli=1

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Tugasan🐙. Tulis balik menjadi ayat sendiri. Teks1 Clyde Kluckhohn (January 11, 1905, Le Mars, Iowa – July 28, 1960, near Santa Fe, New Mexico), was an American anthropologist and social theorist, best known for his long-term ethnographic work among the Navajo and his contributions to the development of theory of culture within American anthropology. Teks2 Among Kluckhohn’s numerous studies of the Navajo are Navaho Classification of Their Song Ceremonials (1938) and Introduction to Navaho Chant Practice (1940, both written with Leland C. Wyman), and Navaho Witchcraft (1944), which is considered his finest work. ------------ Doc. Mcm ni boleh ke? "Clyde Kluckhohn who borned in Le Mars, Iowa in 1905 and died near Santa Fe in New Mexico at the age of 55 was an American anthropologist and social theorist. Among the studies that brought him to fame are Navaho Classification of Their Song Ceremonials (1938) and Introduction to Navaho Chant Practice (1940) and Navaho Witchcraft (1944). He also was recognised for his contributions to the development of theory of American anthropology".

Answer:
popular with finest ethnographic works, Clyde Kluckhohn (1905-1960), contributed outstandingly in the american native culture of the navajo. his contributions remained  a major reference among the american antrophologist and socia theoriest

Yup..so many thgs to do. Remember sifu's formula
📚read🍭analyze💥memorize🌈write

Sunday, 9 November 2014

fadhilat al-quran

http://hafizamri.com/fadhilat-dan-kelebihan-ayat-ayat-quran/

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Dr awang idris's post:-)

🐾🌼🐾🌼🐾🌼 Saya mula mengajar menulis kpd pelajar lain sejak saya mengaji PhD lagi. Ia bermula di garage kereta di Adelaide. Student saya kebanyakannya pensyarah uni yg sambung buat Phd. Ia acara mingguan saya. Sekarang student saya itu sudah jadi Dr juga. Sesekali saya mengajar juga workshop di universiti. Husna mungkin pernah mengikutinya. Jadi blh saya katakan menulis ini bukan hal mudah. Ia perlukan latih tubi pemikiran juga. Di akhir2 semester saya, tinggal beberapa minggu lagi utk saya submit thesis, saya masih diminta mengajar. Saya sebenarnya menyelesaikan banyak masalah dlm PhD kerana keseronokan saya dalam hal menulis. Tetapi menulis sahaja tidak memadai. Ia mesti seronok membaca - WHY sesuatu benda terjadi. Membaca juga tidak memadai. Kena love stats juga. Stats juga tidak memadai. Kena minat dan analitikal dgn metod juga. Jadi barulah ia menjadikan menulis ini hal yg seronok dan PhD sesuatu yg indah. Satu hari saya call HOD betulkah sy buat PhD ini? Sbb sy tak stress? Bagaimana pun, saya tidak begitu segan dengan org. Saya mengirim email bertanya dgn sifu besar bagi hal yg saya ragu2. Bagi saya, mereka juga manusia spt saya juga.

Thursday, 30 October 2014

logitidunal

Cuba google 6 weeks longitudinal + Shimazu Baca Zapf & Dorman

Sunday, 26 October 2014

mediation

http://ripl.faculty.asu.edu/mediation/ http://www.public.asu.edu/~davidpm/classes/psy536/Baron.pdf See page 1173, 1174 and 1178 the justification for a mediator is very very different compared to the justification of a moderator. Also in moderator also there are two types of issue we are looking at 1. Change Direction or 2. Change Strength of relationship. Allow the investigation of the plausibility of "third-variable explanations" for the results of past studies. When there is "inconsistency" you are looking for a possible "moderator" and when there is "consistency" you are looking for a "mediator" (mechanism).